If you were not in attendance at the March 21st meeting of the Hamilton Board of Selectmen and you did not watch it on TV or view it online...here's a word of advice: DON'T WATCH IT!
Not since Selectman Bill Bowler was required to get up at Town Meeting last year and apologize to Hamilton residents for violating (numerous times) the Open Meeting laws have I witnessed a more embarrassing moment than the one that came at the end of Monday night's BoS meeting. Chairman Scuteri chose that time to publicly condemn Selectman Jeff Stinson for answering a question posed to him by a member of the media. His statement to the reporter was essentially the same as the statements he made in open session at the previous Selectman meeting. But the chairman made it clear that she wanted all correspondence with the media to run through her...so she can filter it.
QUOTES:
Stinson: "It sends a bad message to the public to say that you are filtering what you're telling the public on certain items."
Scuteri: "We are absolutely not filtering...it's because I think it (your statement) needed to be filtered...because we took a vote."
What? Point of Information: NO VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE ISSUE. (The issue, by the way, was whether or not $275,000 of mistakenly collected taxes should be returned to the taxpayers. Selectmen Stinson stated he thought it should be returned, as did most others... including the Chairman of the Finance Committee.)
That's not how I interpreted what Selectman Stinson said. To me it sounded like a reiteration of what he said publicly at the BoS meeting where the issue was discussed.
Scuteri: "It's also important for the right person to be getting the credit."
Is that what this is all about? Who gets the CREDIT?
Well, if it is, then I can tell you who deserves all the credit for stirring up controversy and embarrassment for the BoS...and it's not Selectmen Stinson. As of this writing, an article in the Hamilton-Wenham Patch, Selectmen Spar About Comment To The Press, has generated twelve replies, all in favor of Selectman Stinson's position and opposed to Chairman Scuteri's position.
In support of her condemnation of Stinson, Chairman Scuteri said, "We need to know when we leave here (that) no one is going to be disparaged for possibly taking a position that is controversial."